You’ve just won a three-month contract with a major new client – congratulations! Now, you need to figure out how to get the extra work done.
Should you pay your current employees overtime, or bring in temporary help? Consider the following sample cost analysis. It is based on an annual salary of $40,000 ($19.23/hr., based on a 40 hr. work week), vs. time-and-one-half overtime, for one employee:
|Expenses||Paying Overtime||Using a Temporary|
|Over 3 months (13 wks.)||x 520 hours||x 520 hours|
|Connecticut Sales tax||X 6%|
Although this is just a sample exercise for illustration purposes, it clearly demonstrates the economic rationale for using temporary employees. When you need additional productive hours on a temporary basis, staffing services provide a hassle-free way to lower costs, reduce burnout and improve the productivity of your direct staff.
A.R. Mazzotta Employment Specialists – Connecticut’s Staffing Economics Experts
Need help assessing the cost of a staffing strategy? Contact A.R. Mazzotta today. Our experts will work with you to determine the most productive and cost-effective ways to get your work done.
Cost Analysis Assumptions
* Temporary staffing rates vary by market, but the relationship (ratio) between pay rates remains the same.
** Fringe benefits include: holiday pay, sick leave, vacation pay, personal days, insurance, F.I.C.A., S.U.I., F.U.T.A., worker’s compensation, etc., based on a national average of 31%.
*** Based on U.S. Chamber of Commerce national average statistic of 12%, which includes firms that pay no benefits. For small firms with moderate benefits programs, this cost is typically 40-45% of payroll, and for larger firms with extensive benefits programs, the cost can be up to 100% or more of payroll.